Marinated in False Hope

As Proposition 8 passed victoriously in California on election day by a margin of 52% - 48%, many "married" same-sex couples could see their "wedding" vows crumbling. With about 18,000 same-sex "marriages" already on the books, Tuesdays victory for traditional marriage just may deem those "marriages" null and void. The chances of this are tight, but many legal battles on both sides of the fence are definate.

Read about marriage VICTORIES that occured in 3 states on Tuesday.

Many opponents of Proposition 8 have already filed suit with the California Supreme Court in order to "invalidate" the constitutional amendment suggesting that it is unconstitutional.

Read about lawsuits HERE.

Many same-sex "marriages" occured before they were banned by the state of California, but one "marriage" ceremony was right from the "government run indoctrination camp" handbook. The "marriage" ceremony between teacher Erin Carder and her partner Kerri McCoy (Inset Picture) on October 10, 2008 involved eighteen first graders taking a fieldtrip to City Hall to throw flowers at their just "married" teacher.

Watch video of "marriage" ceremony HERE and the full story about the fieldtrip HERE.

As you all know my staff and I are stout supporters of traditional marriage. We strongly agree every state should have a right to vote on the definition of marriage and not one judge holds the legal role to undermine the decision of the people when it comes to a constitutional amendment. If a constitutional amendment is approved by the people and for the people, no lawsuit on the face of the planet can reverse such an approval. If the people have spoken, whom may be either gay or straight, the result of the vote is final. Period. End of story. For those fighting to continue gay "marriage" in CA...don't be such poor losers. You have Massachusetts to play "marriage" in until someone on Beacon Hill realizes that same-sex "marriages" are illegal in MA after all. If this ever becomes a reality, I do believe that all of those "marriages" since May 17, 2004 should be deemed null and void because they were and still are illegal.

As for the children being exposed to the radical and unhealthy "marriage" ceremony between their teachers: Why can't their be fieldtrips to traditional marriage ceremonies? Do you ever here of that happening or is this just another ploy by the radical homosexual community to try and justify their dangerous sexual proclivity to the younger generation? Why is the same-sex couples "wedding" ceremony dangerous to these children you might ask. Well, for starters the importance of a man and a women in a family is downplayed and the concept of "anything goes" is drilled into the child's mind when it comes to whom they can choose to marry later in life. This means that the child is potentially thinking that hey, a mommy and a daddy are not as important to the family as I am being told at home. The image portrayed to the children who watched the ceremony is love should come first and not the beliefs that my parents teach me when deciding what a life partner is. The ceremony also strongly suggests that engaging in abnormal relationships is O.K. even though it could lead me to some very dangerous lifestyle choices.

Anyway, all of this is not going to matter to these 5 and 6-year-olds in the very near future because they will soon understand that same-sex "wedding" ceremonies are illegal for a reason and the teachers "marriage" is null and void. As a result of this the children will come off of the glorified government run indoctrination bandwagon and realize that a mommy and a daddy are the only two genders that can marry and whom can build healthy families for generations to come.

Let The People Vote and the fantasy trip stops and life moves on.

Thank-you California for setting the obvious straight!

Fear Not...!

This is a sign. A sign from Christ to ALL of you out there. As a good Christian friend told me tonight as I was checking my e-mail before bed, this is a sign for the strayed "Christians" of this country.

2 Chronicles 7:14

"if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land."

Insanity - Doing the Same Thing Over and Over Again and Expecting a Different Result.

California voters will ONCE again be able to vote on the definition of marriage one week from this upcoming Tuesday. Voters will be able to cast their ballots on Proposition 8 which states the following:

"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California."

61% of California voters approved a measure in 2001, Proposition 22, with the EXACT 14 letters as stated above. My question is why are they voting on it again???

It has already been established in a crystal clear format that gay "marriage" is NOT legal in the U.S. and can NOT be approved or disaproved of by ANY judicial system. (please refer to my post "Facts Do Not Cease To Exist Because They Are Ignored." - Aldous Huxley" for further details.)

California...your waisting your time!!

Click HERE regarding how four states will vote on gay "marriage" in November...or will the black robes decide how these states voted because they think they have law making authority?? Does anyone understand how the 3 levels of government work???

Sign up for the newsletter and see how San Francisco would become the first major U.S. city to decriminalize prostitution if voters next month approve a ballot inititive.

Next post: The results of Know Thy Facts trip to Amsterdam speaking on behalf of marriage!!

You Have A Lot of Explaining to Do Mr.!!

I am VERY sorry to you all for not letting you know that my staff and I have been overseas for the past month-and-a-half speaking on behalf of marital issues!!!! Very interesting stuff to report to you all.

I will fill you all in this upcoming Wednesday, October 22, 2008.

Thank you for your concerns and patience.

Sincerely,

Scia & staff (and my "T"ed off cat who missed me dearly - sorry bo-jangles!!)

"Facts Do Not Cease To Exist Because They Are Ignored." - Aldous Huxley

Former Massachusetts Govorner Mitt Romney, the founding father of same-sex "marriages" in this country, can not hide from the facts that same-sex "marriages" are STILL illegal across the U.S. eventhough Massachusetts and California ALLOW them.

Why didn't Romney stop the authorization of same-sex "marriage" licenses? What people will do to run for president even at the expense of voters rights.

Read the facts about the illegal same-sex "marriages" in this country and then attempt to refute them.

Also, if you missed it, read up on how Romney invented same-sex "marriages" in Massachusetts with the help of pro-family organizations such as the Massachusetts Family Institute. Click HERE to read the infamous John Haskins report.

A Tragic Loss

My good Christian brother, OMD, had lost a very wonderful person in his life earlier this month. Carolyn, nicknamed CK, died on August 16th, 2008 and was the girlfriend of OMD's youngest son.

The details of the loss will be explained by OMD on his blog very soon, but for now please pray for CK and her restfull place in the bosom of Christ.

P.S. I will respond to all of my readers previously placed comments shortly.

CK 4/7/88 - 8/16/08

May you rest in peace with Him.

Dammed If You Do, Dammed If You Don't

The family of a gay teenager who was fatally shot in class blames the school district for allowing their son to wear makeup and feminine clothing to school - factors the family claims led to the death.

15-year-old Larry King, an eighth-grader at E.O. Green Junior High School, was shot in February in front of his classmates.

Larry was the focus of this past April's Day of Silence. Click HERE for details.

Read many full stories HERE about Larry's death and claim filed by his family.

O.K., so let me get this straight. The parents and brother of this 15-year-old student are taking the first steps needed in order to potentially file a lawsuit against E.O. Green Junior High because they think that the school is responsible for his murder.

1. Why are the parents NOT taking any of the blame especially when this child was at a shelter for abused, neglected and emotionally troubled children at the time of the shooting? Where were the parents in order to prevent Larry from having to be sheltered?????? A childs upbringing starts at home Dawn and Gregory not when you leave your child at the school's front doorstep.

2. If Larry was NOT allowed to wear makeup and high heels because the school decided to enforce their dress code, which would blatenly go against Larry's First Amendment rights, do you think Dawn and Gregory and son would file a lawsuit anyway? ..............YES!!!

Look, this case is tragic, very tragic, but why are the parents blamming the school system for Larry's death when they could of PREVENTED his death by not having their son leave the shelter in the morning with Chanel #9 on??? If the parents knew Larry's situation was a problem at school and the school was not taking action because Larry's First Amendment rights would be violated if they did, why didn't the parents ENFORCE some sort of discipline upon Larry and PREVENT him from wearing a dress?? Would the shelter NOT allow the parents to have a say in what they wanted for their son??

My prediction: This case is going to be LAUGHED out of court, but on the other hand let's pray for Larry and his family who are struggling with the death of their son.

A Change of Plans

All my years in politics and journalism has lead me to make my latest career move. I have been pondering upon this change of careers for quite some time now, and after talking with my colleagues, family and many of my closest friends in Washington, I have made a decision to leave Know Thy Facts, Not Thy Neighbors (KTFNTN) in order to make a difference. I know it may be late in the game, but America needs someone who will stand up for traditional marriage and family and fight for a federal amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect marriage as we know it.

Thank you all for your comments on this blog and for your passion to speak your thoughts and express your opinions to us all.

KTF will still be active, but without my commentary. My staff will take over and will keep you all up to date as to what the marriage front brings us.

God bless you all, and remember, Let The Tricks Be Known!!

Please play the following media report for futher details and thank you for your support.:

"The Criminalization of Homophobia"

Offend a homosexual and you could be put in prison. This could be the fate for some in Brazil if the countries House of Representatives passes a bill that would criminalize anyone who speaks out against the dangerous lifestyles that homosexuals lead.

Read full story HERE.

One question: Do you think this could happen in the United States? Why or why not.

By-the-way: Make sure to read my previous post about the potential repealing of a 1913 law barring out of state same-sex "marriages" in MA below!! The comments are getting interesting!!!

Increase in STD Cases vs. Economic Boost...Is That a Trick Question??

The Massachusetts Senate, AKA Gomorha, caved into the homosexual lobby and "passed" a bill to repeal a 1913 law banning out-of-staters from marrying in MA. Somehow, someway, and ONCE AGAIN, the homosexual community has juxtiposed their cause with the civil rights movement of the 1960's and brainwashed the public into thinking that the 1913 law has to do with interracial marriage and therefore the law is discriminatory.

Let's get TWO things straight here. 1. This 1913 law has NOTHING to do with discrimination. 2. Gay "marriage", as of May 17, 2004, is STILL illegal in Massachusetts.

So, before reading the news briefs on this 1913 law below please provide FACTUAL and LEGALLY BINDING evidence that 1. the 1913 law HAS something to do with racism and/or discrimination and 2. How gay "marriage" became "legal" in MA.

Please stop with the falacious opinions that the judicial system makes law, ect, ect. You all just sound so intellectually lazy. And no more Christ never said anything about the sinful behavior of homosexuality because OMD has provided all the facts we need to hear on this topic and I don't like to read long, kinostetic paragraphs from those who fail miserably to refute the man.

Read what Bay Windows has to say.

Read another point of view on the matter.

Oh, I have to provide an article from MassResistance because some of you think they are a "hate group" for providing a different opinion (whatever that means).

Do We Believe, or Do We Not?

A special message from Tony Snow before he passed away.

Click HERE to read.

Special Protections

A new Colorado law, SB 200, would censorship any sort of discriminatory communications against sexual orientations.

Read full story HERE.

The end of Freedom of Religion or not?

Children Growing Up Confused

I am not sure how to go about commenting on this piece by MassResistance.org other than to say click HERE.

WARNING: The video and photos may be offensive to many. Proceed with caution!!

Schools Ban Father's Day Cards

Six schools in Scotland banned any projects that would focus on making cards for Father's Day which was celebrated last Sunday. With a rise in the number of single family households and same-sex "families" in Scotland, many schools there thought it would be a good idea to stop making the cards in the name of "sensitivity" for those without fathers.

Read full story HERE.

Do to the fact that same-sex "marriages" "legally" ensure that children are deprived of either a mother or a father, it is not a surprise that the militiant homosexual community wants to futher destroy traditional marriages and families by taking out the cornerstone of a family which is a mom and a dad. By futher inching their way into everyone's lives without their consent, the radical homosexual community wants you to cleary understand that a family is not a family just because of a mother and a father, but only because of love and selfish sexual desires.

As George Dent wrote in his article, "The Defense of Traditional Marriage" in The Journal of Law and Politics (University of Virginia, 2001), Vol. XV, No. 4, 590-591.:

"Some argue that love is the only valid requisite for marriage. ...Love takes many forms. C.S. Lewis distinguished family love, affection, erotic desire, friendship, and compassion. All can be good, but compassion is not deemed a basis for marriage. Close relatives often love each other but cannot marry. One who is married may love a third party more that one's spouse, but one cannot marry the third party. Children can love but cannot marry. Many people love pets, but they cannot marry them. Hence, homosexual love is not the only love ineligible for marriage. Indeed, many forms of sexual love, such as pederasty, adultery, bestiality, and incest, are criminal even in states that permit homosexual acts."

Click HERE to understand why fathers are important for a healthy family.

Culture Clash

Harriet Bernstein went on a retreat eight years ago and met her future partner Luisa Paster. Bernstein and Paster formalized their love for one another, a few months after New Jersey legalized civil unions for same-sex partners. They in turn asked to be unionized at a Methodist retreat center, formally known as Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association. The association turned their request down based on their religious belief that marriage is between a man and a women and not between two lesbian lovers.

"When Bernstein and Paster asked to celebrate their civil union in the pavilion, the Methodist organization said they could marry on the boardwalk — anywhere but buildings used for religious purposes. In other words, not the pavilion. (the Rev. Scott Hoffman, the group's administrator) says there was a theological principle at stake."

Read full story HERE.

Although this story has been around for awhile and most of you may or may not have read about it, the precedent it sets is quite dangerous and very much so unconstitutional. Will the teachings in any church regarding the sinful nature of homosexuality be the only thing that will be protected under the Constitution or will religious institutions, and their accompanying estates, have to be subjected to the same rules as any public institution or property? It sounds to me that this case will potentially force ALL religious institutions to reside over same-sex "marriages"/unions or face a civil rights lawsuit. So, in turn freedom of religion, along with traditional marriages and families, will become obsolete unless we ALL speak up and fight this rediculousness.

Jennifer Pizer, a senior counsel at Lambda, a gay rights law group, painted a picture for everyone as if we were all born yesterday when she said:

"Groups that are worried that something new will interrupt their ability to function the way they are functioning will soon see that [gay marriage] will not change the rules that govern their public activities. Those rules have been in place and work just fine."

And why then, Ms. Pizer, are religious institutions being attacked and redefined to fit the sexual desires of same-sex couples? Sorry, we are a little bit smarter than that.

Read the article in which Ms. Pizer's comments are found by clicking HERE.

I only have two questions:

1. Are religious institutions under attack for their beliefs regarding same-sex "marriages" and why can they not adhere to these beliefs when making decisions about the use of their property for sinful events, such as same-sex "marriages"?

2. Is the Methodist organization infringing on public order in ways detrimental to society with their decision and if so how?

A-1: For The Verbally Filleted!

John Haskins of the Underground Journal had some eye-opening facts for Gary, one of my many readers of my blog. Gary claimed that the U.S. Judiciary System can "expand" our laws and that "when a court makes a ruling that interprets the law, the legislative and executive branch are required to enforce that law." Well, Mr. Haskins gave Gary an educational lesson on what our court system can and CAN NOT do in regards to enforcing laws when it comes to controversial topics such as same-sex "marriages".

Gary wrote the following on May 22nd, 2008 in my post titled "Still Illegal Coast to Coast".

Gary:

"The judicial branch does not technically make law, but by interpreting current law, their rulings (obviously) change how law is applied."

John Haskins:

"No, not "obviously" to the Founding Fathers, Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, (and)many top professors of jurisprudence and anyone who bypasses the lies of mercenary ABA-approved courtroom prostitutes (who) dare to read our constitutions.

It is mainly cowardly pseudo-conservative lawyers and law professors who prop up these lies so adamently and stubbornly. A court opinion is an impotent abstraction, utterly without force. In itself it changes nothing. Constitutionally, nothing will change unless and until the executive (or the legislative branch in the case of opinions about the constitutionality of existing statutes) agrees and acts accordingly. The executive branch has the EXCLUSIVE power of the sword and the Legislature has the EXCLUSIVE power of the purse. Even the most liberal justices in communist states like Massachusetts freely admit this. They have recently ruled that the executive branch MUST continue to enforce the statutes until they are revoked by the LEGISLATURE!

Every member of the executive branch from governors and presidents down to town clerks swear a solemn oath in God's Holy name to uphold state and federal CONSTITUTIONS and to execute the STATUTES as written. Licensed attorneys swear the same oath! No one anywhere swears any oath to execute judge's rulings and opinions. In every case the executive branch is absolutely and solemnly obliged to determine whether a court finding is in conformity with the Constitution and statutes or not. If not, it is legally a dead opinion, even if the executive branch believes and acts otherwise."

Gary:

"A court's ruling can "expand" the law. This isn't really something to debate since it's happened over and over again."

John Haskins:

"It's not something for courtroom prostitutes to debate because they have lied to themselves so many times they can't think straight. No matter how smart you think you are or how "conservative" you think you are Gary, you are a robotic, mindless drone for the totalitarian left.

The fundamental distinction between what the law is and what merely happens on the street because members of the executive branch use the power of the sword is being blurred by cowardly, mercenary fake "conservatives" who are ruthlessly subverting constitutional rule of law because they want only to be free to pursue their own monetary and professional advancement while still being admired as principled "conservative" heroes.

A court has absolutely zero power to "expand" the law. The day they pretend to "expand" the law to sieze your property Gary, your children or you as a person and deprive YOU of your unalienable rights as enumerated in the Supreme Law of the United States and the fifty states will be the day your absurd, self-serving pseudo-pragmatism will come to a sudden halt."

Gary:

"Also, based on some of your (Scia's) conclusions, I'm guessing that you're not a law professor."

John Haskins:

"Also, based on your cowardly lies and confusion of dictatorship with the rule of law, I'm guessing you are a lawyer. As a nationally known former law dean told me "The last people to ask about constitutions and separation of powers are lawyers. Most are brainwashed and have no clue."

Gary:

"And marriage has been termed a "civil right" (or "fundamental" right) for quite a while. While the court cases obviously don't reference marriage for gays and lesbians, the decisions do refer to the right to marry as a civil right. So, there's your answer. This isn't debatable. It's just historical fact."

John Haskins:

"Thanks, Gary. If you had a clue about the basic principles of law you'd know that every term in a statute or constitution has a meaning determined by the intent at the point of ratificiation by those who ratified it. "Marriage" is a pre-defined legal concept with thousands of years of affirmation of its precise meaning. That legal term in the MA and CA constitutions and statutes has a fixed meaning that no judge or executive can fudge. "Marriage" as a legal term in English, Canadian and American common law and in American state and federal constitutions means one man-one woman. This is settled. If "marriage" is a civil right between an unrelated adult man and woman that does not constitutionally or statutorilly include a totally contrary or counterfeit concept that judges or anyone else can cleverly merge into the actual right of marriage as plainly defined in actual law ratified by the people or their elected representatives in the exclusively empowered law-making body.

A man and a dog do not qualify as a legal "marriage" under statutes and constitutions that may countenance marriage as a fundamental right that may be exercised between an adult man and an unrelated adult woman. A flower and a bicycle and a rock do not qualify for a legal "marriage." A father and his daughter don't qualify constitutionally or statutorilly as a marriage. Two persons of the same sex do not qualify. That does not fit the LEGAL definition of "marriage."

Many courts have affirmed this. Mixed-race male-female couples DO qualify, for obvious reasons that do not apply to two persons of the same gender. What a number you have done on your own brain in order to stay abreast of the waves of perversion and tyranny. This selling of the soul culminates in taking the Mark of the Beast, selling one's soul for short-lived earthly security and riches. That's quite a deal you've got yourself, Gary!"

Gary:

"Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942) The U.S. Supreme Court first referred to the right to marry as "one of the basic civil rights." Perez v. Sharp (1948) In this case, the California Supreme Court was the first in the 20th century to declare that its state law prohibiting marriage between interracial couples was unconstitutional. The Court said: "Marriage is thus something more than a civil contract subject to regulation by the state; it is a fundamental right of free men."Loving v. Virginia (1967) The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that laws prohibiting marriage between interracial couples were unconstitutional. The Court said: "The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

John Haskins:

"Your entire argument is not at all funny, but it is superficial and bogus. Your bending over backwards to oblige the frightful powers of this creeping dictatorship that cloaks itself in the thinnest veneer of legality. You are a dangerous man.

Go back to storing up earthly treasures, Gary. But hurry up and get what you can before the world ends and we are all judged for our dishonesty, greed and ruthless moral cowardice."

Now, that was a verbal filleting that will go down in the record books.

Anyone wish to refute Mr. Haskin's facts? I look forward to all of your comments and I will respond to them quickly as my team and I are back in MA after taking part in a blogging seminar in Colorado last week.

Good to be back!!!

'There IS a Way Out!'

There is a great post on the Ex-Gay movement by Bob Unruh from WorldNetDaily titled "Now it's EX-'gays' getting pummeled".

Read full article HERE.

The "Best Comment Award" goes to the anonymous author from The State of America when stated:

"...What about the harassment of the goofy looking guy with glasses, or the person with a big wart on her neck, or the one with too many ugly pimples, or wimps, or nerds, or those who wear black cloaks and look like gangsters, or all the others who are often harassed because of appearance or speech problem or whatever? Gays are certainly not the only one silenced, harassed, bullied, alienated, or isolated. A lot of kids have been murdered by others kids because of being harassed before and since the Columbine massacre. Why is their not a national day of protest for them? Because gays are the only group with a corporate funded political agenda."

AMEN!!

Today, We Remember Our Heroes

Black Five.net has an incredible post to give remembrance to those heroes who have fallen to protect our freedom and to those who are still marching to protect Americans of all kinds.

Remember to pray for our soldiers today even if you do not agree with the war. War is horrible, war is awful, but we need to finish what we started or our soil WILL be attacked again.

May Christ give the focus and skill to those who are protecting us day in and day out.

"One Shot, One Kill!!"

Still Illegal Coast to Coast

Although there were celebrations amongst the homosexual community at San Francisco City Hall, and here in Massachusetts, the reality of it all is that same-sex "marriages" are NOT legal in one state of this union, not one.

The California Supreme Court ruled this past Thursday that same-sex "marriages" are to be ALLOWED in the state, but did not rule they were legal in the state, as creating law is not the role of the court system. The people will decide the fate of marriage at the ballot box this upcoming November.

Read full California Supreme Court decision HERE.

As reported in the New York Times:

"The ban on same-sex marriage was based on a law enacted in 1977 and a statewide initiative approved by the voters in 2000, both defining marriage as limited to unions between a man and a woman."

In California, it is Gov. Schwarzenegger's constitutionally sworn duty to ignore the CA Supreme Court's recent opinion and make clear to the citizens of California that same-sex "marriages" are not "legal" until and unless the voters either amend the constitution or pass a law via our elected officials to amend the current marriage statutes to accommodate said same-sex "marriages".

In Massachusetts former Gov. Mitt Romney illegally issued same-sex "marriage" licenses without an accompanying statute claiming the "court legalized same-sex marriages" and that he was just "following a court order."

The Goodridge court in Massachusetts never claimed they were creating a new marriage law. In fact they said so in their opinion:

"We conclude, as did the judge, that M.G.L. c. 207 may not be construed to permit same-sex couples to marry."

In a joint letter to Governor Mitt Romney from pro-family leaders many asked the governor to immediately order all "marriage" licenses illegal.

Read joint letter HERE.

It was not an "activist" or "rogue" court that instituted same-sex "marriages" in Massachusetts even though the judges should have been impeached for even hearing the case because they lacked subject matter according to Article 5 of the MA Constitution. It was Mitt Romney and Mitt Romney ONLY who illegally installed same-sex "marriages" in Massachusetts (or at least the perception that "gay marriage" is "legal") which has led to all sorts of violations of parent's rights (David Parker), religious liberty, and rampant homosexual indoctrination starting in kindergarten. This is a VITAL distinction! Romney was/is the Founding Father of same-sex "marriage" in the United States of America!

Romney had the obligation to ignore the Goodridge decision at the very least and then to call for impeaching the rogue judges as he was advised to do by numerous constitutional scholars (which he chose not to do).

Kris Mineau, executive director of the conservative group the Massachusetts Family Institute, call(ed) the decision (in California) “an attack on democracy.”

Read full story with Kris Mineau's comments HERE in the Boston Herald.

Read full story of California decision in Bay Windows.

Read full story of California illegally overturning the gay "marriage" ban HERE.

O.K., so let me get this straight. Californians voted in 2000 to ban same-sex "marriages" from becoming legal. The California Supreme Court ruled this past Thursday that the ban on gay "marriage" is unconstitutional. The people voted and the courts interpreted marriage as a constitutional civil right for all.

As I have said time and time again on my blog, the courts APPLY the law, they do not CREATE the law. Civil rights come from the democratic process, not lawsuits and court decisions. The people or their elected representatives vote to give particular claims the legal status of civil rights. That's called the "consent of the governed".

In Massachusetts same-sex "marriage" was NEVER approved by the people at the ballot box and was rejected by the people's elected representatives in the state legislature and ignored by our former governor. In both California and Massachusetts those who want same-sex "marriage" to be treated as a civil right and its opponents to be punished as bigots lack democracy's backing. The people of both states never voted to make same-sex "marriage" a civil right. Period!

The issue is not about whether civil rights should be put to a vote, but about voting whether to elevate same-sex "marriage" to the level of a civil right in the first place. Deciding civil rights is the people's civil right not the courts.

With the state of California already with 1 million signatures to put the definition of marriage on the ballot in November, it is a no brainer that California will become the 27th

state in the union to constitutionally ban same-sex "marriages". The homosexual community will soon come to find that they can not depend on activist judges and lazy governors to legalize their sexual proclivities because that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL in America. In a democracy the legislative branch that represents the people decide the laws and not those in black robes. Although radical homosexuals think they have won a victory with the California and Massachusetts decision, they will soon come to grips that their victory will be short lived.

Let The People Vote!!

“We’re Here, We’re Queer, We're Intolerant of Opposing Viewpoints"!

Ryan Sorba, a controversial College Republican at California State University, is the author of the upcoming new book "The Born Gay Hoax" which is to be published in about 6 months. Click HERE for a link to a draft of the book (Key chapters included). Make sure to read Chapter 8, which describes in detail what the "homosexual agenda" is as I have gotten many comments on the definition of this agenda.

Mr. Sorba attempted to speak at Smith College in Northampton, MA this past Tuesday, April 29th, but was interupted by intolerant radical lesbian students who did not want Mr. Sorba to present his speech. Read full story HERE.

Mr. Sorba spoke at Framingham State College last month without any interuptions. Read full Story HERE.

It seems that the homosexual community who is fighting for the very same thing that they stamped out this week, free speech, civil rights, are very intolerant of opposing viewpoints regarding their dangerous lifestyle and will go to length to shut out anyone who heralds these opposing viewpoints.

Mr. Sorba was invited by the Smith Republican Club to speak about his opinion and the studies on the "gay gene", but the event was crashed by those who think their opinion only counts. Why does the homosexual community not tolerate any opposing viewpoints regarding the cause of their dangerous lifestyle? The scientific community is trying to find out the cause of homosexuality and may someday find that it is actually genetically based. If that was the case I would personally shut down this website. All of the studies on the cause of homosexuality point either to it being a personal choice as a result of an abusive childhood or as a result of the "gay gene". It therefore has been and continues to be found that the cause of homosexuality is UNKNOWN regardless of what you or I say, feel or have personally experienced.

Hopefully someday the cause of homosexuality will be determined, such that we can put this issue to rest.

Day of Demonstrations

As the Day of Silence began at Mount Si High School in Seattle this past Friday morning the Rev. Ken Hutcherson, a prominent anti-gay-rights activist, was speaking the truth in love with other students

in protest of the politically filled day at hand.

Pastor Hutchersonof of the Antioch Bible Church in Redmond, Seattle orchestrated the protest outside of the high school and the results were successful.

Read full story HERE and HERE.

Please read my post below titled "Day of Glorifying Homosexuality & Special Interest Groups" to answer some questions about the disruptive Day of Silence.

I will update you all on what occurred around the country on the Day of Silence once news becomes available. If you know of anything please e-mail me at Knowthyfacts@yahoo.com.

Day of Glorifying Homosexuality & Special Interest Groups

Michael Jones, Principal at Lexington High School, sent out a letter to all parents concerning the upcoming Day of Silence event that is going to be held at the school on April 30th of next week.

Read full letter HERE.

I in turn sent Mr. Jones an e-mail asking him a simple question about the Day of Truth, an opposing event that would be held this upcoming Monday, three days before the Day of Silence:

Dear Mr. Jones, I have read your letter that was sent out to parents concerning a recent graffiti incident at Lexington High School and about the Day of Silence on April 30th. It is unfortunate that people can not articulate their opinions without offending others in the fashion of swastikas and homophobic remarks and markings on high school property. This type of behavior should not be tolerated and I hope your school and the authorities will find the perpetrators who spread such "hate speech" at your school.

In regards to the Day of Silence, I was wondering if the Day of Truth would of been recognized at Lexington High School on April 28th, two days before the Day of Silence since this also falls into the category of "free speech is a Constitutionally protected right in public high schools..." as quoted by you in your letter to us parents. Find out more about the Day of Truth by visiting http://www.dayoftruth.org/.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to what your answer is to my request.

Sincerely,

Scia Ciantee

You too can reach Mr. Jones at mjones@sch.ci.lexington.ma.us or by calling him directly at 781-861-2320 ext. 1000.

In regards to Mr. Jones' letter, I, and other pro-marriage and family groups, just have a few questions that we would like answered:

1. The letter states that Lexington High School can not promote or adopt a political position as it is a public institution. The act of students (and even staff) being silent all day is a clear promotion and adoption of the political messages that are being advocated for during the event. The event is unquestionably organized by school staff and just by having the Day of Silence indicates that the school agrees with what the Day of Silence stands for and that is the glorification and acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle.

I thought "no outside groups will be allowed to promote or support the Day of Silence, or to oppose it" as indicated towards the end of the letter. How is this being done when GLSEN, a national organization which targets kids in the public schools is promoting the event with the Gay/Straight Alliance club at Lexington High?

2. So, if the Day of Silence is protected under the "free speech is a Constitutionally protected right in public high schools" category and this "applies to all students, whatever their opinion", but "no outside groups will be allowed to promote or support the Day of Silence, or to oppose it", how do all these statements not contradict each other?

3. Mr. Jones states that "hate speech" -- i.e., criticism of the Day of Silence or homosexuality -- is "subject to legal constraints". Oh, I see. So, anyone who engages in some type of civil discourse about constructive criticism about homosexuality and disagrees with the dangerous lifestyle is going to be "subject to legal constraints"? Can you do that when "free speech is a Constitutionally protected right in public high schools"? Very interesting!!!!

4. Mr. Jones says that people may wear buttons or stickers expressing their personal views. A few years ago at Lexington High a girl with a one-man-one-woman marriage sticker was assaulted by pro-gay students on the Day of Silence. And others were severely harassed and intimidated. The school did nothing. Why did the school not reprimand those students who assaulted the girl?

5. And then the final insult: "the distribution of religious materials is not appropriate during the school day." There has been a lot of blatantly anti-religious material distributed by the homosexual groups. The event itself is essentially anti-religious in the eyes of many parents. Why can the homosexual community distribute anti-religious material, but Christians can not distribute Christian material?

Normalizing Transgenderism for Children

Dr. Norman Spack of Children's Hospital in Boston has started a new clinic at the hospital that gives 9 to 10 year-old children the option for treatments that change their bodies to the opposite sex. The clinic is for those children who are suffering from the psychiatric disorder known as gender identity disorder. If a 9 year-old does not FEAL that they are of the sex into which they were born as, then they can have the option to take drugs that would block puberty and then have the option to alter their genitalia later in life.

Read full story HERE and HERE in the Boston Globe.

I just have one main question: What the HELL does "before they develop bodies that are decidedly male or female mean? You are decidedly male or female when you are born.

"Working on a model borrowed from Dutch researchers, Spack uses drugs to delay the first stirrings of youngsters' puberty, granting them a few more years before they develop bodies that are decidedly male or female."

Don't Silence the Truth

The Day of Truth was established by the Alliance Defense Fund, ADF, to counter the promotion of homosexuality from a Christian perspective, which will be done across the country next Tuesday, April 28th, 2008. The Day of Truth is three days after the Day of Silence, a day in which students remain silent in order to bring attention to the homosexual agenda, which I don't understand how that could happen if people remain silent.

Click HERE for a list of schools in Massachusetts that may participate in the Day of Silence. If your son or daughter goes to any one of the schools listed, Click HERE for a sample letter that you could send to their school administrator telling them you as a concerned parent would like to pull them from school on April 25 in protest of this classroom disrupting day.

The Day of Silence is nothing but a day to disrupt the regular flow of learning in the school house. To silence oneself is to say that the individual in question can not articulate him or herself and only wants to do away with tolerating anything other than what they believe in. If the Day of Silence involved students talking about homosexuality and coming up with any benefits of participating in this dangerous lifestyle then the event would be more worthwhile to hold.

The Day of Truth, on the other hand, advocates civil discourse on the subject of homosexuality in the hopes of helping those who are struggling with this lifestyle. So, don't silence the truth about the dangers of homosexuality, spread it to those who are struggling with the behavior!!!

For more information on how to participate in the Day of Truth please visit the website by going to DayOfTruth.org

"Why Would Someone Do This?"

The post that you are about to read is EXTREMELY sexually graphic with very disturbing accounts of what middle school aged children were taught at a Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) workshop on March 25, 2000.

The statewide conference, called "Teach-Out," was sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and GLSEN.

The kit in the picture above is for "fisting" that was distributed by Planned Parenthood at Fistgate II, which can also be used for homosexual oral sex.

Click HERE to read full GRAPHIC post about "Teach-Out".

Click HERE for the archives on the "Fistgate" workshop.

Click HERE for more information about the Planned Parenthood kit.

I pondered upon the idea of even publishing this post due to its graphic nature. The only way to spread the truth of what the radical homosexual community is teaching our children is to show and present to you the raw material. I do apologize for the graphic details of this workshop, but I am not sorry for telling you the TRUTH!

Normalizing Sexual Proclivities

Lexington Superintendent Paul Ash is under fire for the new diversity curriculum the superintendent will introduce to his kindergarten through fifth grade students next year at Estabrook Elementary School.

Mr. Ash just recently received threats from New Jersey-based Hal Turner's internet talk show in the likes of:

"I would laugh if concerned fathers donned ski masks and gloves, took a ride over to the this arrogant (expletive) house and knock the living (expletive) out of him."

Click HERE to read full story about threats.

Mr. Ash also received an e-mail from a concerned parent earlier last week over the new diversity curriculum for next years kindergarten through fifth grade classes. Shawn Landon, a father of a child in David Parker's son's class, was irate over this news and sent the following e-mails to Superintendent Ash and other school officials.

Click HERE to read full e-mail exchanges.

It is completely and utterly ridiculous that grown men have to threaten bodily harm upon one another over a situation like this. It just goes to show that some people need to participate in violence because they can not articulate their thoughts responsibly enough. This goes for both sides of this deeply emotionally charged issue. Mr. Parker has received threatening and vulgar voicemails at home over his opinions numerous times. Go to threats against Parkers and others under the article about the threats against Mr. Ash and click on threatening phone calls such as this one.

We don't need to resort to physical or verbal threats when it comes to asking for responsible requests from our school officials. We also don't need superintendent of schools blatantly ignoring the law and preventing tax paying citizens from yanking their sons or daughters from a class-room setting that is teaching dangerous behaviors.

Why is it that this case is so one sided? Why can't parents take their children out of a classroom if dangerous behaviors are being discussed? Why do children need to be subjected to homosexuality at such a young age? Who is teaching tolerance, the parents or the special interest organizations that are recommending the curriculum? Where do parental rights begin and where should they end?

Just another day at the government run indoctrination camps.

Thank you Mr. Romney!!

A Couple Days Late and a Few Facts Short

Marc Puleo wrote an opinion piece in the "Voices" section of today's Metro that has many uncited statements and a lot of old news.

Click HERE to read full opinion piece.

Here is my response to Mr. Solomon:

In response to Mark Puleo’s March 31, 2008 letter: “MassEquality fights for universal rights” he quotes MassEquality Campaign Director Marc Solomon:

“Unfortunately, their rate (gay and lesbian youth) of suicide attempts is higher than straight youth and the HIV rate…”

This fallacious assertion which is often cited in both gay and mainstream publications is derived from a 1989 report by a special federal task force on youth and suicide which showed that: 1) gay and lesbian youths accounted for one third of all teenage suicides; 2) that suicide was the leading cause of death among gay teenagers; 3) gay teens who commit suicide do so because of “internalized homophobia” and violence directed at them.

Gay activist Paul Gibson wrote the report based on such shoddy research that Dr. Louis Sullivan, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services officially distanced himself and his department from it. Some of the questionable data and figures include the assertion that the author claims that as many as 3000 gay youths kill themselves each year. But that figure exceeds by one thousand the total number of annual teen suicides. His “one-third” figure came from looking at gay surveys taken at drop in centers for troubled teens that revealed that gay teens had two to four times the suicidal tendencies as straight kids. Gibson then multiplied this higher figure by the disputed and debunked “Kinsey 10% homosexual population” figure to produce his “30% of all teen suicides are gay.” (Peter LaBarbera, “The Gay Youth Suicide Myth,” The Journal of Human Sexuality, 65.)

Mr. Puleo’s article goes on to say, “according to Solomon, the recent hearing on the bill (protection for transgendered individuals) was a first for transgendered rights at the statehouse.”

Mr. Solomon needs to do his homework before making such out of date news flashes because as of March 20th, 2008 Bill H1722, the Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Bill, was stopped in the Judiciary Committee as massive amounts of pressure from Pro-Family organizations took the legs right out from under this piece of legislation.

Also on March 20th, bills H1710, and S918, which would officially legalize same-sex marriage in Massachusetts was also stopped in the Judiciary Committee.

Citations and current updates may help your cause a little more than opinions and yesterdays news Mr. Solomon.

Easter: The Resurrection

Happy Easter to you all.

Today we celebrate the resurrection of Christ. Take some time today to unite yourself with Him and thank Him for all He has done for you, especially his crucifiction for your sins.

Click HERE to read about the facts of His resurrection.

God Bless,

Scia

Transgender Rights and Gay "Marriage" Bills Drown Under Pressure

Bill H1722, the Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Bill, was stopped in the Judiciary Committee today as massive amounts of pressure from Pro-Family organizations took the legs right out from under this sub-human piece of legislation.

Also, Bills: H1710, S918, which would officially legalize same-sex "marriage" in Massachusetts was also stopped in the Judiciary Committee today.

As reported from MassResistance.org:

On Thursday afternoon, March 20th – the deadline for deciding – the Joint Judiciary Committee responded to massive public outcry and dealt a huge blow to the homosexual movement by essentially killing a whole range bills that the gay lobby has been attempting to push into law this year.

Some of these bills (see complete list below) would have severely affected society both in Massachusetts and even around the country. Bill S800 would have allowed out-of-state same-sex couples to get “legally married” in Massachusetts, causing havoc across America. Bill H1722, the Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Bill, is probably the most radical legislation ever seriously considered by the Legislature, and would have forced legal acceptance “transgenderism” throughout society (including restrooms and schools) and made it a hate crime to criticize the behavior. In all, there were a half-dozen particularly destructive bills that the Committee would likely have passed were it not for your public outcry.

H1722 major project of the homosexual movement

The Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Bill (H1722) was the major project this year of the homosexual movement in Massachusetts. This was their next step in their march to change our culture. As described in the media back in January, pushing H1722 through the Legislature was a joint effort by the state's major homosexual activist groups and lobbying groups, plus numerous fringe groups such as the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition (MTPC). This was a serious campaign. They held (at least) two big State House lobbying events and several letter-writing and lobbying efforts. They heavily lobbied key legislators. They dominated the March 4 public hearing with a well-coordinated barrage of 22 “expert” panels and hours of emotional testimony. The bill had the vocal support of dozens of other Massachusetts liberal organizations, and even state agencies. Gov. Deval Patrick, Attorney General Martha Coakley, and Congressman Barney Frank formally endorsed the bill and submitted testimony in favor of it. It had 25 co-sponsors and many other supporters in the Legislature.

So what happened?

We went at them full blast. We published an explosive 125-page report on the bill and exposed exactly what it would do. We went on the media – newspaper, Internet news, and radio – and further exposed the bill and the movement behind it. We made sure that literally thousands of you contacted the Legislature and demanded that this bill not go forward. And we made sure the Judiciary Committee got our explicit testimony at their public hearing (including medical documentation!) even though they clearly didn’t want to hear it.

What does this mean?

THIS is the approach that pro-family groups need to take, not the wishy-washy “moderate” approach we see around the country, with the fear that they might not be “respected”. Yes, if this is important then sometimes you need to be a little confrontational. And we need to continue to put the pressure on, because this year’s fight in the Legislature is only beginning. (Wait till you see our next email!)

Homosexual lobby NOT giving up!

This is unquestionably a major defeat for the homosexual movement in Massachusetts. They had put enormous resources and emotional capital into this and had not anticipated it would get derailed by pro-family pressure.

The homosexual lobby has vowed to try to get H1722 out of study before the July 31 end of the session, and get it passed, although they admit the odds are against it. Bill Conley, head lobbyist for the Mass Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus has announced that they plan to pressure the committee into taking it out of study at some point before July 31, and that they’re organizing to further “explain” their position to committee members. But as the homosexual newspaper Bay Windows reported, “Conley said it will be difficult to get the bill passed before the end of the session.” And don't worry -- we'll be keeping the pressure on, also! We'll keep you posted.

Some good bills also get swept away.

Admittedly, we put most of our energy into making sure that the bad bills didn’t move forward. But there were several good bills, some introduced by MassResistance, that in a perfect world would have moved forward and become law. We weren’t able to make it happen this time, but the Committee did hear our voices and they know we’re not going away on these issues. They know also where the sentiment of the people lies - and it's not with the special interests.

As we said, this fight is not over. There’s still a lot to go. But as we’ve been saying, this battle can – and will – be won.

HERE ARE THE BILLS THAT GOT STOPPED!!

STOPPED! Allow out-of-state homosexual couples to get “legally married” in Massachusetts, then go back to their home states - Bills: S800, S1029, H1728

STOPPED! Transgender rights and hate crimes bill - Bill: H1722

STOPPED! Repeal sodomy laws and other “morality” laws - Bill H1709

STOPPED! Officially legalize homosexual “marriage” by changing the marriage statute - Bills: H1710, S918

STOPPED! Allow a minor to get an abortion WITHOUT parental consent or judge’s order - Bill: H1735

STOPPED! Repeal all laws restricting abortions, and related laws - Bills: H1734, S831

--- GOOD BILLS THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, ALSO FELL SHORT ---

Removes undefined phrase “sexual orientation” from all Massachusetts statutes - Bill: S928 [Filed by MassResistance]

Forces Commonwealth to abide by actual marriage statutes - Bill: S926 [Filed by MassResistance]

The “woman’s right to know” law regarding abortions, with 24 hour waiting period - H1687

Repealing the exemption of schools from the law against “disseminating matter harmful to minors." [Filed by MassResistance]

Update the outmoded “wiretap: law to stop selective harassment of citizens taping public events. [Filed by MassResistance]

Legalizing A Dangerous Psychiatric Disorder

Young "transgender" women who had their breasts surgically removed marched in the streets at Boston Pride 2004. Caption reads: “It was a nice night to doff your shirt.”

These are the types of extremely dangerous behaviors that "transgender rights and hate crimes" bill H1722 will try and normalize EVERYWHERE expect in your own private homes.

Thanks to the fair and balanced analysis of H1722 by MassResistance.org, all residents of Massachusetts can contact their state legislators with facts and demand that this sub-human of a bill be demolished or our society as we know it will be lost.

Click HERE for the complete text of bill H1722.

Please take the time to read about how this bill will affect YOU by clicking HERE.

Click HERE for a bulleted list of talking points of how dangerous H1722 is to society as we know it.

Finally, click HERE as to how the diagnostic manual of the mental health professions (the DSM-IV) defines "gender identity" as a psychiatric disorder.

I only have one question from reading all of the very disturbing information regarding H1722: What is the benefit of legalizing a psychiatric disorder that is clearly dangerous to society?

Kern's Comments Create Controversy

An Oklahoma state representative has received thousands of hostile e-mail messages after she said that homosexuality is a bigger threat to national security than terrorism.

Read full story HERE.

Although I think Rep. Kern's comments suggesting that homosexuality is more dangerous than terrorism is a little bit over the top, the representative is correct in suggesting that homosexuality is a dangerous behavior. The way in which she articulated this thought could be a career ending move.

"According to God's word, that is not the right kind of lifestyle," Rep. Kern said in her speech.

That is a little more like it!!

What do you all think of Rep. Kern's comments and do you think they deserve all of the threatening e-mail responses?

P.S. Sorry for not being around to respond to your comments or post any news stories. I was very sick with the flu for the past two weeks, but I am feeling better now and ready to spread the truth again.

Thanks for your patience.

Scia